Current:Home > ScamsJudge denies Mark Meadows’ request to move his Georgia election subversion case to federal court -ValueCore
Judge denies Mark Meadows’ request to move his Georgia election subversion case to federal court
View
Date:2025-04-19 04:52:48
ATLANTA (AP) — A judge on Friday denied Mark Meadows’ request to move his Georgia election subversion case to federal court, ruling that the Trump White House chief of staff must fight the charges in state court instead.
U.S. District Judge Steve Jones in Atlanta wrote in a 49-page ruling that Meadows “has not met even the ‘quite low’ threshold” to move his case to federal court, noting that the question was whether the actions at issue were related to his role as a federal official.
“The evidence adduced at the hearing establishes that the actions at the heart of the State’s charges against Meadows were taken on behalf of the Trump campaign with an ultimate goal of affecting state election activities and procedures,” Jones wrote. “Meadows himself testified that working for the Trump campaign would be outside the scope of a White House Chief of Staff.”
The ruling is a big early win for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who spent 2 1/2 years investigating and building the case against former President Donald Trump, Meadows and 17 others before obtaining the sweeping indictment under Georgia’s anti-racketeering law. She has said she wants to try all the defendants together.
A lawyer for Meadows did not immediately respond to requests for comment Friday evening. But it seems likely that Meadows will appeal the ruling. In a court filing earlier this week, he asked to separate his case from the other defendants in the case and to halt his proceedings in the state court until a final determination is reached on his attempt to move to federal court, “including through appeal, if an appeal is taken.”
A spokesperson for Willis declined to comment.
Several other people charged in the indictment have also filed motions seeking to move their cases to federal court and have hearings before Jones later this month. Friday’s ruling in Meadows’ case could spell trouble for the others.
Meadows and the others were indicted last month by a Fulton County grand jury on charges they participated in a sprawling scheme to illegally try to overturn Trump’s 2020 presidential election loss in Georgia even though the state’s voters had selected Joe Biden.
All have pleaded not guilty.
Meadows said his actions were taken as part of his role as chief of staff to the Republican president. He and his lawyers also argued that, since he was a federal official at the time, the charges against him should be heard in federal court and, ultimately, dismissed for lack of merit.
Prosecutors said the actions laid out in the indictment were meant to keep Trump in office after he lost to Biden, a Democrat. They said the acts were explicitly political in nature and are illegal under the Hatch Act, which restricts partisan political activity by federal employees. As such, they said, the case should stay in Fulton County Superior Court.
The practical effects of Meadows’ case moving to federal court would have been a jury pool that includes a broader area than just overwhelmingly Democratic Fulton County and a trial that would not be photographed or televised, as cameras are not allowed inside federal courtrooms. But it would not open the door for Trump, if he’s reelected in 2024, or another president to pardon Meadows because any conviction would still happen under state law.
veryGood! (39)
Related
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- American Ramble: A writer's walk from D.C. to New York, and through history
- Get a $120 Barefoot Dreams Blanket for $30 Before It Sells Out, Again
- Camp Pendleton Marine raped girl, 14, in barracks, her family claims
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Colleen Ballinger faces canceled live shows and podcast after inappropriate conduct accusations
- Modest Swimwear Picks for the Family Vacay That You'll Actually Want to Wear
- In Florida, Environmental Oversight Improves Under DeSantis, But Enforcement Issues Remain
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- New Arctic Council Reports Underline the Growing Concerns About the Health and Climate Impacts of Polar Air Pollution
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- The economics lessons in kids' books
- Utilities Have Big Plans to Cut Emissions, But They’re Struggling to Shed Fossil Fuels
- Protests Target a ‘Carbon Bomb’ Linking Two Major Pipelines Outside Boston
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
- A Lawsuit Challenges the Tennessee Valley Authority’s New Program of ‘Never-Ending’ Contracts
- Buying an electric car? You can get a $7,500 tax credit, but it won't be easy
Recommendation
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
January is often a big month for layoffs. Here's what to do in a worst case scenario
Farmworkers brace for more time in the shadows after latest effort fails in Congress
Powerball jackpot now 9th largest in history
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
American Ramble: A writer's walk from D.C. to New York, and through history
Groups Urge the EPA to Do Its Duty: Regulate Factory Farm Emissions
How Buying A Home Became A Key Way To Build Wealth In America